My little Octane Benchmark

Forums: My little Octane Benchmark
Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby ChazZeromus » Wed May 26, 2010 10:40 pm

ChazZeromus Wed May 26, 2010 10:40 pm
I'm new to this kind of rendering and I want to ask, what would do to get rid of the lines besides post-processing? Render longer?
ChazZeromus
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 2:26 am

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby Amplitude » Wed May 26, 2010 10:47 pm

Amplitude Wed May 26, 2010 10:47 pm
What do you mean? What lines?
Win7 Pro x64 | GTX 770 2GB + GTS250 512Mb | Intel Xeon i7 4x 3.4ghz | 16 GB ECC Mem | Intel SSD 520 | Dell 27"
SOFTIMAGE l 2011 + OCTANE V1.20
User avatar
Amplitude
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 1:10 pm
Location: Bordeaux, France

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby colorlabs » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:10 pm

colorlabs Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:10 pm
hi, I gathered all this data up into a spreadsheet - see viewtopic.php?f=21&t=3189
Attachments
octane graphs 2.PNG
Mac OS X 10.8.0 | ASUS GTX 580 1.5GB | MSI GTX 470 | ATI Radeon 6870 | Core i7 2.9Ghz | 16GB
colorlabs
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:53 pm

Quadro 4000

Postby curriergroh » Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:10 pm

curriergroh Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:10 pm
Quadro 4000
1.18 MS
2.25 FPS
Using the settings from the video.
Waiting for a 2GB GTX 460 (besides the Palit), but nobody has them for sale.
Image
Win7x64 | Rhino 5 | i7950 | 6GB | GTX 460 296.1
curriergroh
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:47 pm

@cecofuli

Postby federico » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:46 pm

federico Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:46 pm
How much time did it take with Vray with the same hardware configuration? More or less? And final quality?
Thank you
federico
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:40 am

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby n1k » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:06 pm

n1k Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:06 pm
Gainward GTX460 2gb GS. Clocks= GPU:800, RAM:2000

Cheers,
n1k
Attachments
oc_no_as.jpg
Alpha shadows OFF
oc.jpg
Alpha shadows ON
Last edited by n1k on Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[email protected], 8gb RAM, Gainward GF 460 GTX 2048mb,Win7 64bit.

http://continuum3d.blogspot.com/
User avatar
n1k
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby matej » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:29 pm

matej Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:29 pm
n1k wrote:Gainward GTX460 2gb GS. Clocks= GPU:800, RAM:2000

Cheers,
n1k


Meh, I get to the same no. of samples on the same graphic card with 2.3v5 in 01:33 = 12% of difference

That's a disappointing speed increase :( and probably only due to optimizations.

So, I'm still not getting it; is Octane in 2.4 with cuda 3.2 using all the cores or not?!
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
User avatar
matej
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby n1k » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:37 pm

n1k Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:37 pm
Well, beats me :mrgreen: I think only one of the developers can answer that question. We can just guess :) heheh

P.S. I added bench result with alphashadows turned off.

Cheers,
n1k
[email protected], 8gb RAM, Gainward GF 460 GTX 2048mb,Win7 64bit.

http://continuum3d.blogspot.com/
User avatar
n1k
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby radiance » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:47 am

radiance Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:47 am
I'm not sure myself, although the cuda driver now returns the correct number of cores in use,
the fact that using a GPU performance analysis tool both 3.2 and 3.0 builds use the same percentage of GPU usage,
it looks like 3.0 was using everything too, however i can't say for sure, as i can only see what the performance tools tell me...

On the other hand, the 3.2 builds should be using the GPUs to the maximum extent.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
radiance
 
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby Jaberwocky » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:41 pm

Jaberwocky Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:41 pm
Ok tried the benchmark scene:

My specs:
AMD 1055T with 3 cores switched on and OC at 3.5GHZ
2GB ram
Gigabyte GTX460 1MB
Octane V2.42 (Latest)
Win7 64bit
Nvidia Drivers 266.58

time 3 mins 20secs to complete 4000 samples. GPU Usage only 85% - so no point in running it again with an overclock on the card.

Me thinks you may need a new heavy duty test scene and every one running the new test to compare with.

something that maxes the cards out.
CPU:-AMD 1055T 6 core, Motherboard:-Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+, Gigabyte GTX 460-1GB, RAM:-8GB Kingston hyper X Genesis DDR3 1600Mhz D/Ch, Hard Disk:-500GB samsung F3 , OS:-Win7 64bit
User avatar
Jaberwocky
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm
PreviousNext

Return to Resources and Sharing


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:43 pm [ UTC ]