My little Octane Benchmark

Forums: My little Octane Benchmark
Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby matej » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:59 pm

matej Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:59 pm
Jaberwocky, do the benchmark with pathtracing, and then see CPU usage (and comparable render time with the others)
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
User avatar
matej
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby Jaberwocky » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:50 pm

Jaberwocky Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:50 pm
This is interesting

The results:

4000 samples/Px - Pathtracing on/Alpha Shadows off
Result : 14mins 40Sec

at Stock Speed: 715MHZ Core : 1800MHZ Ram

Overclocked to 820MHZ Core : 2250MHZ Ram

Same result 14 Mins 40 Sec

So how does that work then ?

Card is a Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB model. :shock:
CPU:-AMD 1055T 6 core, Motherboard:-Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+, Gigabyte GTX 460-1GB, RAM:-8GB Kingston hyper X Genesis DDR3 1600Mhz D/Ch, Hard Disk:-500GB samsung F3 , OS:-Win7 64bit
User avatar
Jaberwocky
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby n1k » Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:52 pm

n1k Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:52 pm
Can you post SS? How many megasamples per pixel you have with 820mhz clock?

Cheers,
n1k
[email protected], 8gb RAM, Gainward GF 460 GTX 2048mb,Win7 64bit.

http://continuum3d.blogspot.com/
User avatar
n1k
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby Jaberwocky » Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:07 pm

Jaberwocky Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:07 pm
N1K

To clarify my test result above

The test came in at 14 mins 40sec for 4000 samples/Px at standard 715Mhz stock clock and at 820Mhz overclock.

The net result is that overclocking the card produced no speed increase on the render.

It must be just this scene.There must be something in this scene which is hitting a performance wall.

I did the same test with one of my own scenes and overclocking the card from 715Mhz GPU and 1800Mhz memory to 820Mhz GPU and 2250Mhz memory and this produced a 25% increase in rendering speed.

It's a bit of a mystery

:o :!: :?: :roll:
CPU:-AMD 1055T 6 core, Motherboard:-Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+, Gigabyte GTX 460-1GB, RAM:-8GB Kingston hyper X Genesis DDR3 1600Mhz D/Ch, Hard Disk:-500GB samsung F3 , OS:-Win7 64bit
User avatar
Jaberwocky
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby aaltomar » Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:40 pm

aaltomar Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:40 pm
Using the beta demo 2.46 benchmark scene with unmodified settings and no viewpoint change a FX 1800 got aprox. 1.15 Ms when it settled down compared to a 3.1 Ms with a Quadro 2000. The Q2000 has three times the CUDA cores and the rendering speed difference is aprox. 2.7x better. If you take into account that the FX1800 clock rate is 1342MHz and Q2000's is 1221MHz, then if the Q2000's core would be as high, the difference would be close to 3x again. This means that the cores scale really well. Twice the cores, twice the performance when everything else being equal.

The Quadro 2000 card is a loaner, probably going to substitute it with a GTX 560 Ti 2GB version. With 384 cores and a shader clock rate 1645MHz I'm expecting around 8.4 Ms in the benchmark scene. I don't want to get the GTC 470 as its power draw is significantly higher and I'm liking the 2GB memory on the 560 Ti (+ significantly cheaper).
Setup: Win7 Pro 64bit, XEON X3450, 8GB RAM, Quadro FX 1800, Quadro 2000 for rendering (going to change to a GTX 560 Ti 2GB for rendering).
aaltomar
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm

Re: My little Octane Benchmark

Postby RatedR » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:42 am

RatedR Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:42 am
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR: RatedR

OS: Windows 7 64bit

Software: Octane v1.00 Beta 2.46b - 64bit

MACHINE: Selfbuild

PC RAM: 16 GB DDR3 1600

CPU: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.8 Ghz

CPU THREAD : 8

CPU TEMP (Core min/max) : 50°C - 56°C

--------

GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 590

Cores: 1024

GPU CLOCK: 668MHz

GPU TEMP : 84°C

RENDETIME: 10m 02sec
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

5.80 ms/sec 7.37 FPS
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional
G.Skill DIMM 16 GB DDR3-1600
Intel® Core™ i7-2600K @ 4.8 Ghz
Corsair Hydro Series H70
Point of View GeForce GTX590 Charged
OCZ Agility3 2,5" SSD 120 GB
User avatar
RatedR
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:59 pm
Previous

Return to Resources and Sharing


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests

Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:21 am [ UTC ]