Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Forums: Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness
Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.

Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Postby colorlabs » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:09 pm

colorlabs Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:09 pm
hello everyone,

i took the benchmark data people posted here: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=996&start=0

and put it into a spreadsheet https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AvzT-1kiffQxdFFZQUREd09aUzFwd1pmeUJhYlVUb1E&hl=en&authkey=CIretpwP

I looked up prices on newegg (or google shopping if not found there) and charted performance alongside cost effectiveness (the units being $ per megasamples, multiplied by some unknown constant :)

octane graphs 2.PNG


the 480 is "theoretical" because it seems no one tried it out before switching to a new benchmark on a different thread. it's based on Radiance saying the 480 is 1.2x faster than the 470.

anyway - my quick analysis is that 260's are the best "deal" - assuming that the 470 overclocked post is an anomaly. thoughts?

PS: feel free to point out the probably dozens of flaws in my logic & my spreadsheet :)
Mac OS X 10.8.0 | ASUS GTX 580 1.5GB | MSI GTX 470 | ATI Radeon 6870 | Core i7 2.9Ghz | 16GB
colorlabs
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Postby Daniel » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:09 am

Daniel Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:09 am
I just got my GTX 460 2GB. I'm getting an average of 5.9 megasamples/sec.
Core i7 950 @3.07GHz | GTX 460 2GB | 12GB RAM | Window 7 x64
Daniel
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:52 am

Re: Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Postby radiance » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:09 am

radiance Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:09 am
once cuda 3.2 is out it will be 1,5x faster on these new GTX460 cards. (at least, we hope it will)

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
radiance
 
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

Re: Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Postby colorlabs » Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:17 pm

colorlabs Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Some more graphs from more recent benchmarks:

viewtopic.php?p=30673#p30673
Mac OS X 10.8.0 | ASUS GTX 580 1.5GB | MSI GTX 470 | ATI Radeon 6870 | Core i7 2.9Ghz | 16GB
colorlabs
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Nvidia card benchmarks - cost effectiveness

Postby 9fly » Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:04 am

9fly Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:04 am
How about adding 460 2GB / 470SLI / 480SLI / 480 quad or triple and some cubix versions benchmarks

Thank you.

So may be 470SLI is the best p/p with octane right?
9fly
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:13 am

Return to Resources and Sharing


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 5 guests

Sun Sep 27, 2020 6:21 pm [ UTC ]